STUDY

Monophasic beta-TCP vs. biphasic HA/beta-TCP combined with #Jason® membrane in two-stage sinus floor augmentation procedures – a prospective randomized clinical trial

Jelusic et al.
Monophasic ß-TCP vs. biphasic HA/ß-TCP in two-stage sinus floor augmentation procedures – a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28(10):e175-e183. Epub 2016.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683073

The study compared of monophasic β-TCP (MBS) and biphasic β-TCP (maxresorb®) in maxillary sinus floor elevations using the lateral window technique.

Method:

Biocompatibility, osteoconductivity and implant stability were analyzed histologically, radiologically and by resonance frequency analysis. Overall 60 patients were treated and 67 sinus lifts were performed.

Results/Conclusion:

Both monophasic and biphasic materials show good biocompatibility and osteoconductivity with satisfactory support on implant stability. Six months after sinus lift surgery the radiological volume of maxresorb® was significantly more stable than that of ß-TCP (6.66% vs. 22.2%). In addition, resonance frequency analysis endorsed a higher implant stability quotient for maxresorb® after six months.

Damir Jelusic

, ,
 0

Leave A Comment

Related Posts